Enterprise Resource
Planning Implementation
ERP stands for enterprise resource planning. It usually
refers to the methodology used to integrate 'back office'
computer systems for functions such as planning, manufacturing,
distribution, dispatch, and accounting.
Although not a single piece of software, ERP integrates most
of the functions and therefore does introduce new management
capabilities such as supply chain management.
An ERP implementation is a major investment, often costing
millions of dollars and ties up significant company resources
including computer infrastructure and skilled human resources.
Implementations are always unique and should match the business
processes of the company. Modern ERP software utilises the
'best of breed' philosophy in that it automates the best
processes for a particular industry. So, if a company's
business processes do not match what is required for the
software implementation, additional efforts is required to
re-engineer the processes of the company.
Many companies use an ERP implementation as a catalyst to
improve their business processes. The first step is to simplify
existing processes. Then the company should integrate the
various processes. Finally, the integrated new processes should
be automated using either an existing system or a new system
which might - or might not - be available from the ERP vendor.
So in short: 'Simplify, Integrate, Automate' in that
sequence!
Some companies prefer to implement ERP in stages in order to
reduce risk. This is a wise decision, as ERP implementations
are, by definition, very risky especially if processes and
workflows need to be redeveloped. A staged implementation does
however introduce its own set of risks. Unavailability of key
staff and cost blowouts are examples of such risks. Many ERP
software vendors provide their software in a modular format to
accommodate this type of implementation.
It is important to manage staff fears and expectations. Many
ERP implementations are characterised by changes in staff roles
and responsibilities. Companies therefore face resistance from
staff and the project is sometimes even sabotaged by staff
fearing their jobs. This fear is real because the company after
an ERP implementation will look very different and may well
require staff with new skills sets.
In spite of all the risks, a well managed ERP implementation
has many advantages. As the key information systems are now
linked together, the company's various departments can easily
share data. In addition, the workflow between the various
departments should now be more streamlined and, of course,
automated. The net result of these improvements is a faster and
more cost-effective operation and better customer service.
|